Lachenman v. stice
Webv. ) ) Trial Court Case No. CAMERON F. CLARK, IN ) 49D02-1306-MI-016812 . HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ) OF THE INDIANA ) DEPARTMENT OF ) The Honorable ... Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E. 2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) because unlike the dog in . Lachenman, Ms. Liddle’s dog, Copper, has no market value and therefore, Campins v. Capels,
Lachenman v. stice
Did you know?
WebLachenman v. Stice , 838 N.E.2d 451, 457 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). However, although intent is a required element, it is not enough that the defendant acted with an intent that is … WebLachenman v. Stice: 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.App.) In this Indiana case, a dog owner whose dog was attacked and killed by a neighbor's dog, brought an action against the neighbor to recover veterinary bills and emotional distress damages. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant-neighbor ...
WebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 461 (Ind. App. 2005). Defendant Annette Holdings, Inc. d/ b/a TMC Transportation, Inc. paid and settled the Plaintiff’s claim for property damage … WebStice , 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied . Lachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the terrier. The trial court determined Lachenman's damages would be limited to the terrier's purchase price and to veterinary bills.
WebJan 12, 2009 · Appellant's App. p. 190. On December 9, 2003, the Lindseys filed suit against DeGroot Dairy seeking to enjoin the dairy from further operation and for compensation for nuisance, negligence, trespass, criminal mischief, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. DeGroot Dairy filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2007. WebLachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the terrier. The trial court determined Lachenman's damages would be limited …
WebApr 30, 2009 · Lachenman v. Stice: 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.App.) In this Indiana case, a dog owner whose dog was attacked and killed by a neighbor's dog, brought an action against the neighbor to recover veterinary bills and emotional distress damages. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant …
WebApr 7, 2013 · Unlike Mitchell, the 2005 case Lachenman v. Stice sought to dramatically expand the available class of personal property for which sentimental value could be recovered. In Lachenman, the plaintiff sought to recover the sentimental value for the loss of her Jack Russell terrier after it was attacked and killed by her neighbor’s German … heli toy helicopterWebBrief of The Humane Society of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant-Plaintiffs’ Petition for Rehearing 6 evidence that Defendants’ farm is causing a physical invasion on Plaintiffs’ property, the Court lakehead university masters of public healthWebMay 11, 2006 · Get free access to the complete judgment in LACHENMAN v. STICE on CaseMine. he lit the fireWebLachenman, 838 N.E.2d at 457. The court found that even though the neighbors may have been negligent in failing to keep their dogs on leashes and otherwise failing to properly supervise their dogs, such actions did not constitute outrageous behavior as contemplated by the narrow definition adopted from the Restatement. Id. helit the arcWebMay 30, 2003 · Lachenman v. Stice, No. 15A01-0503-CV-113. United States Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana November 30, 2005 ...this vicious propensity at the time of the alleged … helit the germanWebJustia › US Law › Case Law › Indiana Case Law › Indiana Court of Appeals Decisions › 2005 › Sean T. Lachenman v. Mitchell & Josephine Stice Mitchell & Josephine Stice Receive free … lakehead university mba canadaWebpavlacklawfirm.com lakehead university my success